Результаты (
русский) 1:
[копия]Скопировано!
А. г. Лафли, Генеральный директор Проктер и Гэмбл, принес много творчества и строгость P & G в инновационный процесс. В течение последних двух лет P & G поднял свой новый продукт хит ставка (процент новых записей, которые обеспечивают возвращение выше стоимости капитала) от 70% до 90%. Это потрясающий в отрасли, где половина новых продуктов терпит неудачу в течение 12 месяцев, по данным исследования рынка фирма информационных ресурсов. «В 18 лет что я следовал Проктер,» говорит берега Эндрю аналитика Deutsche Bank, «Я никогда не видел компании это хорошо.»Органический рост, смысл рост от основной деятельности, исключая выгоды от приобретения - в корне P & G в трансформации. По словам Лафли органического роста укрепляет способность компании к инновациям.Кокс, Крафт и Unilever являются лишь немногие из гигантов, которые пытаются инновациям и строить брэнды, они уже есть. Согласно недавнему обзору Бостонской консультативной группы старших руководителей более чем 2/3 сказать инноваций является приоритетом, но 57% недовольны возвращается на свои инвестиции в инновации.Лафли имеет модель для инновации в большой компании:1. Jim Stengel, Procter's Chief Marketing Officer, has cut his reliance on focus groups - the conventional method for studying consumers. "You don't really learn anything insightful," he says, contending that P&G and its rivals have already met consumers' obvious needs and that today's opportunities lie in meeting needs that consumers may not articulate. So he has urged the marketers to spend lots of time with consumers in their homes, watching the ways they wear clothes, clean their floors, and asking them about their habits and frustrations.2. Procter and Gamble has 7,500 R&D people located in nine countries. In order to collect feedback over this vast area, the company encourages employees (both scientists and marketers) to post problems on an internal website. Lafley evaluates the ideas that have been shared between employees. Each year he presents his findings in half-day "innovation reviews" for each business unit.3. Lafley says that his goal is to get half of P&G's invention from external sources, up from 20% four years ago and about 35% today. "Inventors are evenly distributed in the population, and we are al likely to find invention in a garage as in our labs," he explains.4. It's not the P&G's way to put out a product without test-marketing it. But consumer testing takes time - a luxury that P&G executives increasingly don't have. Says Susan Arnold, P&G's beauty queen: "We don't have the time to cross al the t's and dot all the i's. This business is trend-based and fashion-based. You have to be intuitive." By cutting down on test-marketing (but not on science), P&G has reduced product launch time from laboratory to roll-out from three years to 18 months company-wide.5. Lafley believes that P&G needs to market not just the product itself but the consumer's experience of the product - how it looks, smells and feels. Three years ago he added a head of design at P&G, a company veteran named Claudia Kotchka, who reports directly to him. Her designers used to labour in anonymity on logos and packaging. But they are now deeply involved in all aspects of product development. For Olay Regenerist, they helped with the formulation and the fragrance too.6. In an attempt to encourage growth, some companies offer fat bonuses for innovation or hire stars from outside. Lafley hasn't done either of those things. He doesn't need to revamp pay schemes, he says, noting that managers who fail to share ideas simply do not get promoted. He does motivate the rank and file by giving out modest rewards, such as giving 50 stock options, for creative ideas and by celebrating innovators on P&G's internal website.
переводится, пожалуйста, подождите..