Результаты (
русский) 1:
[копия]Скопировано!
Four factors seem to have been behind the demonstrations that brought Sino-Japanese relations to a new low, although it was the history issue in general thatunderlay the entire episode. First, chronologically, on April 1 Japanese Minister ofEconomy, Trade and Industry Nakagawa Soichi made an announcement that Japanwas going to give Japanese companies rights to explore for gas and other resourcesin contested waters between Japan and China. On April 4 Japanese officialsinformed Beijing’s Embassy in Tokyo that Japan would soon begin its oceanicexplorations and that China should suspend its explorative activities in the sameregion and report its current findings to Tokyo. This incensed many in China.Second was the recurrence of the textbook issue, as has already been described,wherein on April 5, Japan’s Ministry of Education approved for use a number ofhistory texts that avoided reference to the wrongful acts committed by Japan and hertroops in WW2.Third was Japan’s bid for a permanent seat on the United Nations SecurityCouncil and an unprecedented Chinese internet-based petition drive to protestJapan’s campaign for such a seat. In 2005 the UN had undertaken a series of majorreforms and there were two models being discussed at the UN as to how to reformthe UN Security Council, one of which would see Japan as one of six newpermanent members of the Security Council.30 In a visit to the Chinese Mission tothe UN in New York in early 2005, the author was told by the Chinese representativethat China would not support Japan’s candidacy to the UNSC unless Japan fullycomes to terms with its war-time aggression, thus making it “a responsible nation” inChinese eyes. Because a veto from a permanent member of the UNSC like Chinawould derail any such attempt to make Japan a permanent member, Japan’sascension to permanent member status seems highly unlikely unless the history issueis resolved. Spearheaded and sustained primarily by Chinese around the world, aglobal web-based petition drive took place in March and April 2005 protesting anydiscussions of Japan becoming a permanent member of the UNSC. It was verysuccessful, Chinese official sources saying some 30 million people signed thepetitions. Of Japan’s bid for a UNSC permanent seat, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabaosaid, “Only a country that respects history, takes responsibility for history and winsover the trust of peoples in Asia and the world at large can take greaterresponsibilities in the international community.”31The fourth factor that seemed to have been a catalyst to the demonstrations wasthe courage and radicalism of the South Korean demonstrators who protested inTokyo and Seoul in March over the ongoing Dokdo/Takeshima Islands dispute. BothKoreans and Japanese have laid claims to the uninhabited islets between the twocountries primarily because of the natural resources possession of them could bring.Particularly inflammatory to Koreans was a March 16 law passed by Japan’sShimane prefecture, which claims jurisdiction over the islets, stating that Japan hassovereignty over the so-called Takeshimas. When South Korea sent a smallcontingent of police to occupy and protect the Dokdos, South Koreans took to the
переводится, пожалуйста, подождите..