Keep your client relationships afloat.
By Morgen Witzel
The passengers of the Aurora had every right to be angry. The round-the-world cruise for which they had paid thousands of pounds was this month cancelled after persistent engine problems.
Yet there was little rancour among the passengers. While the ship was held off the south coast of England, the passengers remained calm and even cheerful. Though many expressed regret as they finally disembarked, they were not hostile towards the ship's operators, P&O. This way have been due to the company's management of the crisis.
Dealing with a service failure is a formidable task for any marketing manager. If poorly handled, the consequences can be bad public relations, desertion by customers and even lawsuits. The Aurora story shows how managers, if they move quickly, can avoid some of the worst effects of service failures.
While high-profile cases such as the stricken cruise ship are relatively rare, companies everywhere may regularly suffer small service failures. Plumbers fail to fix leaking drains, restaurant meals are undercooked or holidaymakers find their hotel room is directly above an all-night disco. Every failure creates a dissatisfied customer, which in turn creates other problems for the company.
Unhappy customers tend to tell others of their experience. Studies in the US have shown that dissatisfied customers tend to tell around ten other people of their bad experience; even worse, they can take their stories to the press.
Dissatisfied customers also defect to rival businesses.Although every service failure will be different, some basic principles can assist in recovery. The first is early recognition of the problem. In P&O's case this was easy: everyone involved knew that the large lump of metal floating in the Solent was not going anywhere. Other failures are harder to detect, especially when management is asleep at the wheel.
The second principle is acceptance of responsibility. Many companies prefer, in the style of Basil Fawlty, John Cleese's accident-prone character, to argue with customers over where responsibility lies, without realising that damage is being done regardless of who is at fault. Although there are limits to the responsibilities companies should accept - such as accidents and injuries that were not the company's fault - there is usually little profit in scoring moral victories over customers. Hence clothing retailers often have a no-questions-asked policy on returned goods, believing that the harm done by the occasional dishonest customer is more than outweighed by the satisfaction created among the rest.
Once responsibility is accepted, the two most urgent needs for the company to address are communication and compensation. Transparency is vital. Academic studies have shown that when faced with product or service failure, companies that communicate truthfully and promptly with their customers receive a favourable responce. These customers feel that their concerns are actually being addressed and taken seriously. In the Aurora case, senior P&O managers were often on hand to provide information to passengers, who regarded this as a positive feature.
Compensation must be carefully matched to the customer's dissatisfaction. Too small an amount trivialises the customer's experience and can give offence, but it is also possible to go too far the other way. Researches in the US found an example of a hotel chain that had a policy of instantly refunding the full room rate to any guest with a genuine complaint, no matter how trivial. Yet many customers - against expectations - found it embarrassing to be given hundreds of dollars in compensation when they had merely complained about a faulty light fixture or a dripping tap.
Service industries often have their compensation benchmarks. In the holiday sector, the standard was set by the 19th-century inventor of the package holiday, Thomas Cook, who made it his policy to refund in full the money paid by any customer whose holiday was curtailed or cancelled, and offer a discount on their next booking. P&O's policy would have pleased Cook - the company reportedly offered the same level of compensation to the passengers of the Aurora. Not every package holiday company follows this example.
Following these simple principles should please most customers most of the time. Research across a wide variety of service industries over the past 20 years confirms that a successful service recovery operation reduces or even eliminates any consumer dissatisfaction.
The aborted cruise of the Aurora was disappointing for P&O's passengers. But the consequences could have been far worse. Many of the passengers said they planned to travel on a P&O cruise in the future.
Результаты (
японский) 1:
[копия]Скопировано!
あなたのクライアントの関係を保つ海上。モルゲン ウィッツェルアベニューキャンパスによってオーロラの乗客は怒っているようにすべての権利を持っていた。今月は数千ポンドを支払って彼らいたラウンドの世界クルーズの永続的なエンジンの問題後取り消されました。まだ少しあれれ、乗客の間であった。船は、イングランドの南海岸を離れて開催されました、間乗客は冷静とも陽気。最後に上陸したように後悔する多くの表現、彼らもしませんでした敵対的船のオペレーター、P & o.この方法は経営危機のためにされています。サービス障害への対処は、マーケティング マネージャーの素晴らしい作業です。処理が不十分な場合、結果は悪い広報、お客様とも訴訟によって脱走をすることができます。オーロラ ストーリー方法マネージャー、迅速に移動する場合の一部回避できますサービス障害の最悪の影響を示しています。知名度の高いケースも被災クルーズ船は比較的稀である、一方どこの企業でも小さなサービス障害を定期的に苦しむことがあります。配管漏れの下水管が解決されない、レストランでの食事は加熱が不十分なまたは行楽客ホテルの部屋は終夜のディスコの真上を見つけます。すべての障害、会社の他の問題に作成される不満の顧客を作成します。不幸な顧客は、彼らの経験の他を言う傾向があります。米国の研究は、不満を抱えた顧客彼らの悪い経験; 約 10 の他の人々 を伝える傾向にあることを示されています。さらに悪いことに、彼らはプレスを彼らの物語を利用できます。不満を持つ顧客はまた企業に匹敵する欠陥します。すべてサービス障害はそれぞれ異なりますが、いくつかの基本的な原則は回復で助けることができます。最初の問題の早期認識です。P & O のケースでこれは簡単だった: 関係者全員がソレントに浮かんでいる金属製の大きな塊が、どこへも行きませんでした知っていた。その他の障害を検出する、特に管理は車輪で眠っている困難です。第二の原則は、責任の受諾です。多くの企業を好む、ベズル Fawlty のスタイルについて論争する顧客と実現することがなく、責任の所在が損傷が行われているに関係なく人は障害では、ジョン · クリーズ事故を起こしやすい文字。事故や傷害が同社の障害 - など - 会社が受け入れるべきである責任に限界があるが通常少しに利益が以上の顧客の道徳的な勝利を獲得します。それ故に衣料品小売業者頻繁があるいいえ質問質問ポリシー返品、時折不正直な顧客によってできている害残りの間で作成された満足度が増加よりも信じること。Once responsibility is accepted, the two most urgent needs for the company to address are communication and compensation. Transparency is vital. Academic studies have shown that when faced with product or service failure, companies that communicate truthfully and promptly with their customers receive a favourable responce. These customers feel that their concerns are actually being addressed and taken seriously. In the Aurora case, senior P&O managers were often on hand to provide information to passengers, who regarded this as a positive feature.Compensation must be carefully matched to the customer's dissatisfaction. Too small an amount trivialises the customer's experience and can give offence, but it is also possible to go too far the other way. Researches in the US found an example of a hotel chain that had a policy of instantly refunding the full room rate to any guest with a genuine complaint, no matter how trivial. Yet many customers - against expectations - found it embarrassing to be given hundreds of dollars in compensation when they had merely complained about a faulty light fixture or a dripping tap.Service industries often have their compensation benchmarks. In the holiday sector, the standard was set by the 19th-century inventor of the package holiday, Thomas Cook, who made it his policy to refund in full the money paid by any customer whose holiday was curtailed or cancelled, and offer a discount on their next booking. P&O's policy would have pleased Cook - the company reportedly offered the same level of compensation to the passengers of the Aurora. Not every package holiday company follows this example.Following these simple principles should please most customers most of the time. Research across a wide variety of service industries over the past 20 years confirms that a successful service recovery operation reduces or even eliminates any consumer dissatisfaction.The aborted cruise of the Aurora was disappointing for P&O's passengers. But the consequences could have been far worse. Many of the passengers said they planned to travel on a P&O cruise in the future.
переводится, пожалуйста, подождите..
