WHAT MAKES A GOOD DOCTOR? At one of

WHAT MAKES A GOOD DOCTOR?
At one of the hospitals in a certain town there worked two young doctors. Let's call them Dr P. and Dr Q. They were very good friends — these doctors, P. and Q., and they had been good friends for a long time. They had studied at the same medical school under the same professors, and, what was even more important in strengthening their friendship, they had lived in the same room during their course of studies. Now they worked at the same hospital and always discussed what was most interesting to both of them — how to treat their patients. Their approaches to the problem were quite different, though they had studied under the same professors. Dr P. was for a thorough investigation of the patients' health and condition, for a set of thorough analyses before the patient's illness could be diagnosed. He was against chance taking any part in diagnosis. As for Dr Q., he said that a thorough investigation and sets of analyses were important, but could sometimes be wrong, and it was just as important for a doctor to use his talent, experience, and intuition when diagnosing a patient's illness, all the more so , since sometimes there was no time for a thorough investigation and analyses —something had to be done quickly to save the patient's life. The nurses at the hospital thought Dr P. to be a better doctor than his friend, for whatever he did, he always did it thoroughly. 'One feels sure with him,' they said. As for Dr Q., some of the nurses thought that he took the treatment of his patients too lightly, because he sometimes diagnosed their illnesses at once, before making a thorough investigation. It was true that he always diagnosed them correctly, but people thought that he was sometimes too quick in his decisions. One day a worker was brought to the hospital. He had suddenly fallen ill at the plant where he worked. There hadn't been any accident. He had just fallen ill, and fallen seriously ill. The doctors examined the man but could not diagnose his illness for sure. It was clear that the man was suffering greatly and that he took his suffering bravely. But what did he suffer from? — that was the question. Dr P. ordered a thorough investigation of the patient; but when Dr Q. examined him, he thought that the man must be operated on at once. It seemed to him that he knew the man's illness. But how could the man be operated on before all the analyses were made, before one knew for sure what was wrong with him? Later that night the man's condition became much worse, and he nearly died. It was Dr Q. and the nurse on duty, who were with him all the time, who managed to save the man's life. Next day, when the results of the analysed came, it became quite clear that an operation was absolutely necessary, and that valuable time had been lost. After the operation the man felt better and was later able to go back to his work at the plant. Nothing terrible had happened. The man was well again.

Результаты (русский) 1:

ЧТО ДЕЛАЕТ ХОРОШИЙ ВРАЧ? At one of the hospitals in a certain town there worked two young doctors. Let's call them Dr P. and Dr Q. They were very good friends — these doctors, P. and Q., and they had been good friends for a long time. They had studied at the same medical school under the same professors, and, what was even more important in strengthening their friendship, they had lived in the same room during their course of studies. Now they worked at the same hospital and always discussed what was most interesting to both of them — how to treat their patients. Their approaches to the problem were quite different, though they had studied under the same professors. Dr P. was for a thorough investigation of the patients' health and condition, for a set of thorough analyses before the patient's illness could be diagnosed. He was against chance taking any part in diagnosis. As for Dr Q., he said that a thorough investigation and sets of analyses were important, but could sometimes be wrong, and it was just as important for a doctor to use his talent, experience, and intuition when diagnosing a patient's illness, all the more so , since sometimes there was no time for a thorough investigation and analyses —something had to be done quickly to save the patient's life. The nurses at the hospital thought Dr P. to be a better doctor than his friend, for whatever he did, he always did it thoroughly. 'One feels sure with him,' they said. As for Dr Q., some of the nurses thought that he took the treatment of his patients too lightly, because he sometimes diagnosed their illnesses at once, before making a thorough investigation. It was true that he always diagnosed them correctly, but people thought that he was sometimes too quick in his decisions. One day a worker was brought to the hospital. He had suddenly fallen ill at the plant where he worked. There hadn't been any accident. He had just fallen ill, and fallen seriously ill. The doctors examined the man but could not diagnose his illness for sure. It was clear that the man was suffering greatly and that he took his suffering bravely. But what did he suffer from? — that was the question. Dr P. ordered a thorough investigation of the patient; but when Dr Q. examined him, he thought that the man must be operated on at once. It seemed to him that he knew the man's illness. But how could the man be operated on before all the analyses were made, before one knew for sure what was wrong with him? Later that night the man's condition became much worse, and he nearly died. It was Dr Q. and the nurse on duty, who were with him all the time, who managed to save the man's life. Next day, when the results of the analysed came, it became quite clear that an operation was absolutely necessary, and that valuable time had been lost. After the operation the man felt better and was later able to go back to his work at the plant. Nothing terrible had happened. The man was well again.

Результаты (русский) 2:

ЧТО ДАЕТ ХОРОШИЙ ВРАЧ?
В одной из больниц в одном городе работали два молодых врачей. Давайте назовем их д - р П. и д - р В. Они были очень хорошими друзьями - эти врачи, П. и В., и они были хорошими друзьями в течение длительного времени. Они учились в одной медицинской школе при тех же профессоров, и, что еще более важно , в укреплении их дружбы, они жили в одной комнате во время их курса обучения. Теперь они работали в той же больнице и всегда обсуждали , что было самым интересным для них обоих - как относиться к своим пациентам. Их подходы к проблеме были совершенно разные, хотя они изучали при тех же самых профессоров. Д - р П. был для тщательного изучения здоровья и состояния пациентов, для набора тщательного анализа , прежде чем болезнь пациента может быть поставлен диагноз. Он был против случайно принимая никакого участия в диагностике. Что касается д - ра Q., он сказал , что тщательное расследование и множества анализов были важны, но иногда может быть неправильно, и это было так же важно для врача , чтобы использовать свой ​​талант, опыт и интуиция при диагностике болезни пациента, все тем более, так как иногда не было времени для тщательного изучения и анализа -что - то должно было быть сделано быстро , чтобы спасти жизнь пациента. Медсестры в больнице думали , доктор П. быть лучшим врачом , чем его друг, за что бы он ни делал, он всегда делал это основательно. «Чувствуется уверен , с ним, говорили они. Что касается д - ра Q., некоторые из медсестер думали , что он взял лечение своих пациентов слишком легко, потому что он иногда диагностируется свои болезни сразу же , прежде чем сделать тщательное расследование. Это правда , что он всегда им был поставлен диагноз правильно, но люди думали , что он иногда слишком быстр в своих решениях. Однажды рабочий был доставлен в больницу. Он внезапно заболел на заводе , где он работал. Там не было какой - либо аварии. Он только что заболел, и тяжело заболел. Врачи исследовали человека , но не мог диагностировать его болезнь наверняка. Было ясно , что этот человек сильно страдает и что он принял его страдания стойко. Но что же он страдает? - Это был вопрос. Д - р П. приказал провести тщательное расследование пациента; но когда доктор Q. обследовали его, он считал , что человек должен работать на сразу. Ему казалось , что он знал , что болезнь этого человека. Но как мог человек работать на ранее были сделаны все анализы, прежде чем знал наверняка , что с ним не так? Вечером того же дня состояние человека стало гораздо хуже, и он чуть не умер. Это был д - р В. и дежурная медсестра, кто был с ним все время, которому удалось спасти жизнь человека. На следующий день, когда пришли результаты анализируемого, стало совершенно ясно , что операция была абсолютно необходима, и что драгоценное время было потеряно. После операции человек чувствовал себя лучше , и позже смог вернуться к своей работе на заводе. Ничего страшного не случилось. Человек был хорошо снова.