High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email
[email protected] to buy additional rights. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/59be86a8-c284-11d9-866a-00000e2511c8.html#ixzz3UTXWpcTk
Sign in Register Subscribe
Home
Video
Interactive
Blogs
News feed
Alphaville
beyondbrics
Portfolio
Special Reports
In depth
Today’s Newspaper
Tools
World
Companies
Markets
Global Economy
Lex
Comment
Management
Life & Arts
May 12, 2005 3:00 am
Global harmony is their dream
By Sarah Murray
If managing diversity in the workplace is a tough task for business leaders, the challenges of keeping executives from different backgrounds working together efficiently in various parts of the world is even more difficult.
However, virtual working presents some unexpected benefits to teams whose members come from a variety of backgrounds.
For executives whose first language is not English,
for instance, working by means of e-mail or online chat rooms can eliminate many of the communication inequalities that might exist were the group to be working together face-to-face in the same location.
People tend to be more comfortable reading and writing in their second language than speaking it, and e-mail technology provides those less sure of the language with an opportunity to reflect before communicating.
"It certainly suggests that one of the things you should take into account is whether your team includes members who don't speak English well," says Joanne Yates, a professor of management at MIT Sloan, who has studied the use of communication and information systems in companies.
"Any good virtual team has a communication plan that includes weekly conference calls or e-mail check-ins, but with a virtual team where not everyone speaks English well, the regular report-ins should be in written mode rather than by phone or conference call."
The other advantage of e-mail communications is that, for those working in different time zones, group messages can be responded to when it is convenient, reducing the need for early morning or late night calls.
At the same time, using e-mail for work exchanges can remove much of the hierarchy of professional communications, since many executives find it far less intimidating to send an e-mail to someone in a senior position than to telephone them.
"In many organisations that are fairly hierarchical, the lower and middle management executives often won't communicate with senior managers if it means picking up the phone," says Emma Kirk a psychologist at Pearn Kandola, a UK-based research business and consultancy of occupational psychologists.
"E-mail removes that barrier because of its informality and immediacy, so it encourages people to communicate that might not
otherwise" says Ms Kirk. "And it's now accepted that people will send off ideas to each other via e-mail."
However, cultural or behavioural differences that can manifest themselves in face-to-face working situations can be exacerbated in virtual team working, particularly when the group has members from different backgrounds.
One reason for this is that, when one is physically immersed in a new culture, it takes less time to adapt to the social norms and become aware of cultural sensitivities. So those trying to do this at a distance may find it tougher to fit in, increasing the potential for misunderstandings between team members.
"You don't build the relationships in the same way as you do working face-to-face, and you don't have those water cooler chats," says Martin Galpin, managing psychologist at Pearn Kandola.
He argues that the differences can become more problematic when people
are not working in the same location.
"When you have a group of people who are more diverse, there's a danger of increasing the chances of conflict if you don't manage it effectively."
For this reason, experts advise that those managing virtual teams organise face-to-face meetings at the start of a project or the formation of a new team of executives who will be working to-gether remotely.
While this is true for all virtual teams, it is even more important for those with cultural differences.
"If a team is newly formed, there's huge value in bringing that team together," says Mr Galpin.
"Or if a new person joins the team, they need to be able to build new relationships. There's always a need for the social side - even if that's just setting aside time for more informal chats during the conference calls."
Prof Yates points out that, when people in professional groups come from different backgrounds or cultures, it is often useful to appoint someone in the team who knows both cultures
as the person responsible
for setting the norms of working behaviour during
a project that is being
carried out from different locations.
And virtual working certainly does not eradicate the sort of cultural misunderstandings that can arise in a face-to-face situation.
Prof Yates cites an online mini-conference she recently observed that took place between a group of US and Japanese executives working in the research and development unit of a Japanese company.
"A Japanese executive was putting text into a window for instant messaging when one of the Americans started asking questions in the middle of the presentation," she explains.
"That was not culturally familiar and required an instant response, which caused real problems.